Contents
Introduction
India’s stray dog crisis is both a public health and ethical challenge. Humane, participatory governance—rooted in compassion, science, and civic engagement—offers a sustainable alternative to indiscriminate culling.
Understanding the Crisis
- Population scale: Estimates suggest 15–20 million stray dogs in India (FAO, 2021).
- Public health risk: WHO data indicates India accounts for 36% of global rabies deaths, ~20,000 annually.
- Policy gap: The Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001 and amended 2023 mandate sterilisation and vaccination, but implementation remains patchy due to poor funding, infrastructure, and coordination.
Why Humane Solutions Matter
- Ethical imperative: Mass culling violates Article 51A(g) of the Constitution (duty to show compassion to living creatures).
- Scientific basis: Studies show catch–neuter–vaccinate–release (CNVR) is more effective in stabilising populations than removal, as dogs are territorial and new unsterilised dogs fill vacated spaces (“vacuum effect”).
- Global precedents: Kerala 2016: Culling failed to control dog attacks, numbers rebounded within two years. Jaipur’s CNVR program (Help in Suffering NGO) reduced rabies cases in dogs by 98% over a decade.
Role of Civic Engagement
- Community feeding and care: Reduces aggression and builds trust for vaccination drives. Example: Kolkata’s citizen feeders coordinate with local vets for post-bite monitoring.
- Citizen vigilance: Reporting unvaccinated or aggressive dogs to municipal bodies enables targeted intervention without harming healthy populations.
- Behavioural change campaigns: Civic groups can promote responsible pet ownership to prevent abandonment, a key driver of stray populations.
Role of NGOs in Governance Strengthening
- Service delivery gap-filling: NGOs like Friendicoes (Delhi), Himalayan Tails (Uttarakhand), and Blue Cross of India (Chennai) conduct sterilisation, vaccination, and rescue where municipal capacity is lacking.
- Data and monitoring: NGOs can maintain dog population databases, track sterilisation coverage, and identify rabies hotspots—helping evidence-based policymaking.
- Training and capacity building: NGOs often train municipal dog catchers in humane handling, reducing injury and stress to animals.
Governance Reforms for Humane Policy
- Public–NGO–Municipality partnership models: Formal MoUs with NGOs for sterilisation targets, budget allocation, and reporting protocols.
- Integrated rabies elimination plans: Align with WHO’s goal of zero dog-mediated human rabies deaths by 2030, combining human post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with dog vaccination.
- Legal safeguards: Strengthen enforcement of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960; make cruelty and illegal culling punishable with deterrent penalties.
- Urban planning integration: Designate feeding zones, shelter spaces, and community-managed dog parks to reduce street conflicts.
Social Equity Lens
- Inclusivity: Recognise that most urban stray caretakers are lower-income citizens, not elites—dispelling the myth that compassion for dogs competes with human welfare.
- Livelihood linkage: Community-based sterilisation and feeding programs can create local jobs, especially for women and youth.
Conclusion
Civic engagement and NGO partnerships can transform stray dog governance—aligning public health, compassion, and constitutional values—ensuring humane, scientifically sound policies replace short-sighted cruelty and create lasting coexistence.


