Contents
Introduction
Despite Jal Jeevan Mission gains, India faces persistent water contamination, causing disease and deaths, revealing systemic governance failures where access has improved faster than quality assurance and last-mile public health safeguards.
Systemic Challenges: Infrastructure and Governance Deficit
- Aging pipeline infrastructure: Old, corroded and leaking pipes allow sewage ingress and chemical contamination, especially during intermittent supply cycles common in Indian cities.
- Intermittent water supply model: Non-continuous supply creates negative pressure, drawing contaminants into pipelines, unlike 24×7 systems recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).
- Fragmented institutional responsibility: Urban local bodies manage supply, State departments regulate quality, and pollution control boards monitor sources, leading to accountability gaps.
- Reactive regulatory culture: Monitoring often follows outbreaks, as seen in Indore (2025) and earlier jaundice outbreaks in Bhopal and Odisha, reflecting weak preventive surveillance.
Public Health Burden: Silent but Severe
- High disease load: According to the WHO and UNICEF, unsafe water and sanitation cause nearly 2 lakh deaths annually in India, mainly from diarrhoeal diseases.
- Urban poor vulnerability: Slums and low-income settlements, though connected to piped water, face higher exposure due to illegal connections and low-pressure supply, violating the principle of environmental justice.
- Economic costs: NITI Aayog estimates water-related illnesses impose significant productivity losses, reinforcing the poverty-health trap.
Limits of Source-Based Monitoring
- False sense of safety: Municipal supply is classified as an “improved source” under NFHS, yet contamination often occurs after treatment, within the distribution network.
- Inadequate testing frequency: Current protocols emphasize raw water and treatment plants, ignoring last-mile contamination risks.
- Regulatory mismatch: BIS 10500 drinking water standards exist, but enforcement at household delivery points remains weak.
Delivery-Point Monitoring: A Paradigm Shift
- Public health logic: Testing water where citizens actually consume it aligns with the precautionary principle recognised by the Supreme Court in Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India.
- Early warning mechanism: Chlorine residual testing, microbial indicators like E. coli, and real-time sensors can detect failures before outbreaks occur.
- Accountability enhancement: Delivery-point testing fixes responsibility on service providers, strengthening duty of care under Article 21’s right to life.
- Global best practice: Countries like Singapore and the UK mandate continuous distribution monitoring, ensuring trust in tap water systems.
Implications for Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM)
- From access to assurance: JJM’s next phase must evolve from “Har Ghar Jal” to “Har Ghar Safe Jal”, integrating quality metrics.
- Community-based surveillance: Village Water and Sanitation Committees and urban RWAs can conduct field test kits monitoring, as piloted in Gujarat and Telangana.
- Digital water governance: Integration of IoT sensors, GIS mapping and water quality dashboards aligns with the Digital India vision.
Way Forward: Institutional and Legal Reforms
- Continuous supply transition: Move towards 24×7 water systems to prevent ingress contamination.
- Legal enforceability: Make BIS water standards statutorily binding, not advisory.
- Capacity building: Train urban local bodies in water safety planning, as recommended by the Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation (CPHEEO).
- Citizen awareness: Public disclosure of water quality data to uphold the right to information.
Conclusion
As Justice P.N. Bhagwati stressed, the right to life includes health and dignity. Delivery-point water monitoring transforms Jal Jeevan Mission from infrastructure delivery into a genuine public health guarantee.


