[Answered] Examine the role of ‘second-generation reforms’ in higher education as a catalyst for Viksit Bharat. Evaluate how enhancing faculty capability and integrating inclusive, reflective learning practices can transform Indian universities into centers of global excellence and equitable growth.

Introduction

With India’s Gross Enrolment Ratio crossing 28% (AISHE 2023) and NEP 2020 entering implementation maturity, second-generation reforms are vital to shift higher education from expansion-led growth to quality-driven national development.

Second-Generation Reforms as the Qualitative Core of Viksit Bharat

  1. From Structural Access to Learning Outcomes: First-generation reforms expanded access through multiple entry-exit systems, Academic Bank of Credits, and institutional flexibility. Second-generation reforms now target the classroom—the true engine of capability creation.
  2. Knowledge Economy Imperative: World Bank (2023) estimates show that human capital contributes over 60% of long-term economic growth in developed nations. Without deep learning reforms, India risks remaining a ‘credential economy’ rather than a knowledge economy.
  3. Global Competitiveness: QS and THE rankings consistently highlight teaching quality, research culture, and faculty-student engagement as determinants of global excellence—areas directly addressed by 2G reforms.

Enhancing Faculty Capability as Human Infrastructure

  1. Pedagogical Capacity Deficit: Nearly 30% of Indian faculty enter classrooms without formal training in pedagogy (UGC, 2024), limiting effectiveness in outcome-based education and interdisciplinary teaching.
  2. Continuous Professional Development (CPD): Second-generation reforms emphasise CPD over episodic workshops, aligning with OECD models where faculty upskilling is treated as institutional responsibility, not individual discretion.
  3. From Instructor to Learning Facilitator: Faculty roles must evolve from content delivery to mentoring, problem-solving, and AI-assisted facilitation—critical in blended and flipped classrooms.
  4. Institutional Enablers: Centres for Teaching and Learning (CTLs), as adopted in IIT Bombay and Ashoka University, institutionalise evidence-based pedagogy and instructional leadership.

Aligning Pedagogy with Assessment for Outcome-Based Education

  1. Beyond Rote Evaluation: India’s examination-centric culture prioritises recall over cognition. Authentic assessments—portfolios, simulations, capstone projects—align with Bloom’s higher-order learning objectives.
  2. Learning-Outcome Mapping: Outcome-Based Education (OBE), endorsed by NBA and Washington Accord, ensures curricular coherence between teaching intent and assessment design.
  3. Industry-Academic Integration: NASSCOM (2024) reports persistent employability gaps despite rising degrees. Aligning pedagogy with industry-validated competencies bridges this structural mismatch.
  4. Formative Feedback Loops: Continuous assessment enables timely feedback, improving retention, critical thinking, and learner motivation.

Inclusivity and Reflective Learning as Pillars of Equitable Excellence

  1. From Access to Success: Second-generation reforms prioritise success metrics for SEDGs and Divyang students through assistive technologies, adaptive AI tutors, and universal design for learning (UDL).
  2. Multilingual and Cultural Inclusion: Platforms like Bhashini enable instruction across Indian languages, while integrating Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) ensures epistemic diversity and civilisational continuity.
  3. Reflective Learning Models: Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle—experience, reflection, conceptualisation, application—builds metacognition and problem-solving capacity essential for innovation-led economies.
  4. Mental Well-being and Cognitive Equity: WHO and UNICEF studies link student well-being with academic performance, necessitating counselling, mentoring, and balanced workloads.

Systemic Challenges and the Way Forward

  1. Regulatory Mindset Shift: Transitioning from compliance-centric regulation to trust-based academic autonomy remains essential.
  2. Sustained Public Investment: Achieving the 6% of GDP education target (Kothari Commission) is critical for faculty research, inclusive infrastructure, and innovation ecosystems.
  3. Leadership and Governance Capacity: Professional university leadership and differentiated academic roles enhance productivity without eroding autonomy.

Conclusion

Echoing Justice D.Y. Chandrachud’s emphasis on constitutional capability-building, second-generation higher-education reforms must transform classrooms into engines of equity, excellence, and innovation—ensuring India’s demographic dividend matures into a global developmental asset.

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community