Contents
Introduction
As of early 2026, the inclusion of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine into the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) for girls aged 9–14 marks a decisive victory against cervical cancer, the second most common cancer among Indian women. This science-first move is a bold counter-narrative to the anti-vax trends seen in Western geographies.
Addressing a Silent Epidemic
- Disease Burden: India accounts for nearly 1.27 lakh new cervical cancer cases and ~80,000 deaths annually, contributing over 65% of WHO-SEARO’s burden. Persistent infection with HPV types 16 and 18 causes over 80% of cases.
- Screening Coverage: Among women (30–49 years) remains below 2%, indicating prevention through vaccination is critical. The nationwide campaign targeting 14-year-old girls institutionalises a preventive approach against the second most common cancer among Indian women.
HPV Drive in the Era of Global Vaccine Hesitancy
- Countering Anti-Vaccination Narratives: Measles resurgence across parts of the U.S. and Europe reflects declining immunisation trust. India’s programme signals a science-first governance model, backed by the WHO’s single-dose recommendation.
- Institutional Anchors: Recommended by the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation. Implemented through designated public facilities under the UIP ecosystem. Digitally tracked via the U-WIN platform, successor to Co-WIN.
- Global and Economic Dimensions: Backed by Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, ensuring supply resilience. Preventive vaccination is fiscally rational: treatment of advanced cervical cancer imposes high out-of-pocket expenditure, contradicting Ayushman Bharat’s financial protection goals. Aligns with SDG 3 and WHO’s 90–70–90 cervical cancer elimination targets.
Historical Sensitivities and the AEFI Imperative
India’s HPV trials (2009–10) in Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat witnessed deaths later deemed unrelated to the vaccine but raised ethical and surveillance concerns. This history underscores why Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI) monitoring is central.
Why AEFI Systems Matter:
- Scientific Credibility: Distinguishes coincidental illnesses from causal vaccine reactions and prevents misinformation spirals amplified via social media.
- Constitutional Obligation: Article 21 (Right to Life) mandates safe medical intervention. Transparency fulfils principles of informed consent and accountability.
- Institutional Trust-Building: Rapid Response Teams and 48-hour post-jab observation protocols enhance credibility. Digitised AEFI reporting via U-WIN improves traceability.
- Long-Term Healthcare Outcomes: Sustained immunisation coverage depends on community confidence. Weak surveillance could jeopardise future drives (e.g., adolescent boosters, new vaccines). Economic Survey 2025–26 underscores preventive healthcare as fiscal prudence, while Budget 2026–27 expands immunisation outlays.
Governance and Implementation Challenges
NITI Aayog’s health reforms emphasise preventive, promotive care, but implementation gaps persist at district levels.
| Aspect | Key Issue |
| Socio-Cultural | HPV linked to sexual transmission; parental stigma possible. |
| Federal Coordination | Success depends on State Health Departments and NHM synergy. |
| Cold-Chain Integrity | Heatwaves (2024–25) exposed infrastructure vulnerabilities. |
| Voluntary Nature | Requires Behaviour Change Communication (BCC). |
Way Forward
- Institutionalising Transparent AEFI Surveillance: Independent pharmacovigilance audits and public dashboards on adverse events (aggregated, anonymised data).
- Behavioural Communication Strategy: Engage school teachers, ASHAs, and community leaders to frame vaccination as cancer prevention, not sexual health intervention.
- Integrating Screening and Treatment: Expand VIA/HPV DNA testing under Ayushman Arogya Mandirs and ensure referral linkages for detected lesions.
- Indigenous Vaccine Ecosystem: Fast-track WHO prequalification for India-made vaccines to enhance vaccine sovereignty.
- Global Leadership Role: Position India as a template for the Global South, leveraging its polio eradication and COVID-19 vaccination experience.
Conclusion
India’s HPV program is more than a medical intervention; it is an assertion of scientific sovereignty. By prioritizing adolescent health and rigorous safety monitoring, India is ensuring that the demographic dividend of 2047 is not just young, but healthy and cancer-free.


