Q. Consider the following statements in the context of the ethical dilemma arising from the cancellation of a government recruitment examination:
1.Collective punishment of all selected candidates is justified if irregularities are found in the recruitment process.
2.Candidates who cleared the examination in good faith should be given due process before any adverse action is taken against them.
3.Ensuring the integrity of public recruitment requires an impartial investigation into allegations of irregularities.
4.Administrative convenience should take precedence over the legitimate expectations of candidates who have already been appointed.
Which of the statements given above are ethically appropriate?
Answer: B
Notes:
Explanation: Candidates should not be subjected to collective punishment merely because irregularities are alleged. Those who cleared the examination in good faith deserve fair hearing and due process before any adverse action. At the same time, maintaining the credibility of public recruitment requires an impartial investigation and accountability for proven wrongdoing. Administrative convenience cannot override fairness and legitimate expectations.
Source- MISC
