Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 2 From Fiscal Devolution to Fiscal Dependence: The Changing Federal Equation
- 3 Rise of State Development Loans (SDLs): Debt as Shock Absorber
- 4 The ‘Cess and Surcharge Trap’: Constitutional and Economic Implications
- 5 Macroeconomic and Federal Consequences
- 6 Way Forward: Restoring Devolution as the Stabiliser
- 7 Conclusion
Introduction
Despite constitutionally mandated tax devolution, rising reliance on cesses and surcharges has weakened States’ fiscal stability, pushing them toward debt-led financing, as highlighted by Finance Commission reports and post-GST revenue trends.
From Fiscal Devolution to Fiscal Dependence: The Changing Federal Equation
- Erosion of the Divisible Pool: Articles 270 and 271 of the Constitution envisage shared taxation as the backbone of fiscal federalism. However, the Union’s growing dependence on cesses and surcharges — non-shareable levies — has reduced effective devolution to States. While the 15th Finance Commission fixed States’ share at 41%, RBI and PRS Legislative Research estimates suggest actual transfers hover near 30–31%.
- GST and Vertical Imbalance: Post-GST (2017), indirect taxes with high buoyancy are centrally collected and redistributed through formula-based transfers, weakening the fiscal link between State tax effort and reward, especially for industrialised States like Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra.
Rise of State Development Loans (SDLs): Debt as Shock Absorber
- Borrowing for Revenue Expenditure: With devolution losing its counter-cyclical role, States increasingly rely on State Development Loans (SDLs) even for routine expenditures such as pensions, salaries and health insurance schemes. In 2024–25, SDLs formed 35% of Tamil Nadu’s and 26% of Maharashtra’s revenue receipts — levels once considered fiscally unsustainable.
- Post-COVID Structural Shift: The COVID-19 shock (2020–21) marked a turning point when Central transfers proved inadequate. This debt-dependence persisted even during recovery, indicating a structural fiscal squeeze rather than a temporary crisis response.
The ‘Cess and Surcharge Trap’: Constitutional and Economic Implications
- Parallel Budgeting by the Centre: By 2025–26, cesses and surcharges account for nearly 15–18% of Gross Tax Revenue, creating a “parallel budget” beyond Finance Commission oversight (Article 280). This dilutes cooperative federalism and sidelines States from national tax buoyancy.
- Conditional Autonomy via CSS: Most cess-funded expenditures flow through Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS), compelling States to align spending with Union priorities rather than State-specific developmental needs — undermining fiscal autonomy.
Macroeconomic and Federal Consequences
- Rising Debt-to-GSDP Ratios: States like Punjab, West Bengal and Himachal Pradesh now face debt-to-GSDP ratios exceeding 35–40% (RBI, 2024). SDL yields remaining above 7% raise interest burdens, crowding out public capital expenditure.
- Pro-cyclical Fiscal Stress: As noted by the FRBM Review Committee (NK Singh), when transfers fall during downturns but interest obligations remain fixed, States risk entering a primary deficit trap, borrowing merely to service past debt.
- Weakening the Finance Commission: If revenue growth bypasses the divisible pool, the Finance Commission’s constitutional role in correcting vertical and horizontal imbalances is effectively hollowed out.
Way Forward: Restoring Devolution as the Stabiliser
- Inclusive Divisible Pool: Long-standing cesses (fuel, health, education) should be progressively merged into the divisible pool, as advocated by multiple State governments and former RBI Governors.
- Capping Non-shareable Levies: Legislating an upper cap on cesses and surcharges (e.g., 10% of GTR) would prevent fiscal centralisation by stealth.
- Rewarding Tax Effort: Reworking horizontal devolution criteria to give greater weight to tax effort, efficiency and compliance can restore fiscal incentives for States.
Conclusion
Strong States make a strong Union. Sustainable growth demands devolution-led stability, not debt-led survival, within India’s constitutional fiscal architecture.


