[Answered] Analyze the role of the Supreme Court in ensuring the sanctity of electoral democracy in India in light of recent judgments. Discuss the implications of these judgments on the relationship between the judiciary and the executive.
Red Book
Red Book

Introduction: Give a brief context to the question

Body: Highlight the role of SC in ensuring electoral sanctity of electoral democracy and implications on relations between judiciary and executive

Conclusion: Way forward

The Indian Supreme Court plays a crucial role in upholding the sanctity of electoral democracy through its interpretations of the Constitution and pronouncements on election-related matters. Recent SC judgements in declaring the electoral bonds scheme unconstitutional and pronouncing AAP the winner in the mayoral race in Chandigarh, seem to strike a welcome blow on behalf of electoral democracy.

Role of SC in ensuring the sanctity of electoral democracy

  • Electoral reforms: The Supreme Court, in cases like Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India, mandated disclosure of candidate information like criminal records, financial assets, and educational qualifications. This empowers voters with vital information, enhancing transparency and fairness in elections.
  • Political Accountability: The Supreme Court has also intervened to ensure political accountability by holding public officials and political parties accountable for their actions. For instance, in cases related to electoral bonds and funding of political parties, the Court has sought to promote transparency and prevent the influence of black money in politics.
  • Election disputes: The Supreme Court resolves electoral disputes and disqualifies candidates for breaking laws or engaging in corruption, ensuring electoral integrity.

Implications for Judiciary-Executive Relationship

  • Assertive Judiciary: New rulings show that the Supreme Court is prepared to stand up for its independence and demand accountability from the government in election-related cases. Thus, democratic checks and balances may be strengthened.
  • Possibility of Tension: Tension and friction between the two institutions may arise from judgments that are thought to have an impact on the political interests of the executive. This may be harmful to democracy’s ability to run smoothly.
  • Requirement for Collaboration: Collaboration between the court and the executive branch is necessary for the successful execution of electoral reforms and the resolution of problems such as election financing. Maintaining the integrity of the electoral process requires cooperation.

Conclusion

Maintaining a balance between judicial independence, executive accountability, and public trust is crucial to ensure the effectiveness of the judiciary in safeguarding the electoral process.

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community