[Answered] Critically analyze the role of the Speaker in the Indian legislative system. Should the Speaker’s powers be limited?

Introduction: Brief introduction about speaker.

Body: Highlight role of speaker and if his powers should be limited or not?

Conclusion: Way forward

India is a parliamentary democracy, with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha presiding over legislative proceedings. In the Indian legislative system, the Speaker has a vital and complex role. In both state legislative assemblies and the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian parliament, the Speaker acts as the presiding officer.

Role of Speaker in the Indian Legislative System

  • Impartiality: The Speaker should respect democratic values and act impartially. They are not allowed to cast votes or take part in debates unless there is a tie. But in reality, Speakers frequently represent the governing party, which can cast doubt on their objectivity.
  • Order and decorum: The legislature cannot operate effectively unless the Speaker plays a key role in upholding order during debates and making sure that the norms of procedure are respected. They have the authority to punish members who cause disruptions to meetings.
  • Making Decisions: The Speaker may set the order in which legislation and motions are discussed and may also choose which members may speak at a debate. They can influence the legislative agenda because of their power.
  • Casting Vote: The Speaker holds the casting vote in the event of a tie, which may be a huge source of influence, particularly in closely divided houses.
  • Representation: The Speaker gives the President or Governor the House’s opinion. This serves a significant ceremonial and constitutional purpose.

Arguments against limiting the speaker’s powers

  • Constitutional Role: The Speaker of India is endowed with particular powers under the Indian Constitution, and any attempt to curtail these powers would necessitate amending the Constitution. Maintaining the division of powers as envisioned by the Constitution is crucial.
  • Experience and Knowledge: The Speaker’s profound knowledge of parliamentary customs and procedures is essential to the House’s efficient operation.
  • Accountability: The Speaker is accountable to the House, and members can move a motion of no confidence if they believe the Speaker is acting in a biased or partisan manner. This accountability mechanism can mitigate concerns about misuse of power.

Arguments for Limiting the Speaker’s Powers

  • Partisanship: There may be questions regarding the Speaker’s impartiality because they frequently belong to the ruling party. To maintain justice, there have been proposals for a neutral Speaker to be selected from outside the ranks of elected members.
  • Abuse of Power: The Speaker’s authority to choose the legislative agenda and to grant members a chance to speak may be abused for political ends. Decisions that are biased in favour of the ruling party may result from this.
  • Impact on Committees: The Speaker has the authority to designate people to serve on several parliamentary committees. This influence may weaken the system of checks and balances by affecting the government’s supervision and examination.


The Speaker is considered the true guardian of the Indian Parliamentary democracy, holding the complete authority of the Lok Sabha. Thus, the impartiality of the office is very important to make parliamentary democracy work in the true sense.

Print Friendly and PDF