[Answered] De-escalation in West Asia is crucial for global stability amidst widening rifts. Analyze its implications for multilateralism, international peace, and how it shapes India’s strategic interests in the region.

Introduction

West Asia’s volatility poses grave threats to global peace, energy security, and economic stability. De-escalation is essential not just for regional calm, but for sustaining multilateralism and India’s long-term strategic calculus.

Body

Implications for Multilateralism and International Norms

  1. Erosion of International Law: Pre-emptive strikes by Israel and U.S. on Iranian nuclear facilities violate sovereignty norms, setting dangerous precedents for unilateral action.
  2. Selective Multilateralism: Institutions like the UN Security Council remain paralysed due to geopolitical alignments, weakening their credibility as neutral arbitrators.
  3. Global Hypocrisy in De-escalation Appeals: The world’s call for “de-escalation” often ignores the power asymmetry between aggressor and aggressed, blurring accountability—mirrored in how India was asked to de-escalate post-Pulwama (2019).
  4. Undermining NPT Framework: With Iran cornered and Israel remaining the region’s sole undeclared nuclear power, the relevance of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) suffers a strategic blow.

Impact on Global Peace and Economic Stability

  1. Oil Market Volatility: Any blockade of the Strait of Hormuz—through which a fifth of global oil passes—would destabilise international energy markets, with India especially vulnerable as 54% of its oil comes from the Gulf.
  2. Potential Spillovers: Missile strikes on U.S. bases in Qatar and Iraq signal an expanded war theatre, risking conflict spillover into other fragile regions like Yemen, Syria, and even Afghanistan.
  3. Humanitarian Consequences: With 56,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza (as per independent observers), Israel’s actions deepen regional resentment, radicalisation, and undermine peace prospects.

India’s Strategic Interests and Foreign Policy Dilemma

  1. Energy and Diaspora Concerns: With over 8 million Indians in West Asia and 40% of remittances sourced from the region, India’s economic and human security are directly tied to regional stability.
  2. Chabahar and INSTC: India’s $85 million investment in Iran’s Chabahar Port—strategically vital for connectivity to Central Asia and Afghanistan—faces risk amid U.S.-Iran tensions.
  3. Balancing Act: India maintains robust defence and tech ties with Israel (e.g., Barak missiles, Heron drones) while supporting Iran in connectivity and energy security, reflecting a complex diplomacy.
  4. Muted Diplomacy: India’s cautious “de-escalation” stance reflects its strategic need to avoid alienating any regional bloc, similar to its neutral position on the Russia-Ukraine war, showcasing issue-based multipolar diplomacy.

Future Outlook and Global Role

  1. Opportunity for Leadership: As a member of BRICS, SCO, and G-20, India can push for peace platforms and revival of the JCPOA (Iran nuclear deal), enhancing its credibility as a peace broker.
  2. Defence Preparedness: Increased volatility underscores India’s need for diversified energy imports, strategic reserves, and enhanced maritime security along its extended neighbourhood.

Conclusion

De-escalation in West Asia is vital to prevent wider conflicts, uphold international norms, and safeguard India’s strategic and economic interests. A balanced, proactive diplomacy is India’s best long-term approach.

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community