Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Second-Generation Reforms as the Qualitative Core of Viksit Bharat
- 3 Enhancing Faculty Capability as Human Infrastructure
- 4 Aligning Pedagogy with Assessment for Outcome-Based Education
- 5 Inclusivity and Reflective Learning as Pillars of Equitable Excellence
- 6 Systemic Challenges and the Way Forward
- 7 Conclusion
Introduction
With India’s Gross Enrolment Ratio crossing 28% (AISHE 2023) and NEP 2020 entering implementation maturity, second-generation reforms are vital to shift higher education from expansion-led growth to quality-driven national development.
Second-Generation Reforms as the Qualitative Core of Viksit Bharat
- From Structural Access to Learning Outcomes: First-generation reforms expanded access through multiple entry-exit systems, Academic Bank of Credits, and institutional flexibility. Second-generation reforms now target the classroom—the true engine of capability creation.
- Knowledge Economy Imperative: World Bank (2023) estimates show that human capital contributes over 60% of long-term economic growth in developed nations. Without deep learning reforms, India risks remaining a ‘credential economy’ rather than a knowledge economy.
- Global Competitiveness: QS and THE rankings consistently highlight teaching quality, research culture, and faculty-student engagement as determinants of global excellence—areas directly addressed by 2G reforms.
Enhancing Faculty Capability as Human Infrastructure
- Pedagogical Capacity Deficit: Nearly 30% of Indian faculty enter classrooms without formal training in pedagogy (UGC, 2024), limiting effectiveness in outcome-based education and interdisciplinary teaching.
- Continuous Professional Development (CPD): Second-generation reforms emphasise CPD over episodic workshops, aligning with OECD models where faculty upskilling is treated as institutional responsibility, not individual discretion.
- From Instructor to Learning Facilitator: Faculty roles must evolve from content delivery to mentoring, problem-solving, and AI-assisted facilitation—critical in blended and flipped classrooms.
- Institutional Enablers: Centres for Teaching and Learning (CTLs), as adopted in IIT Bombay and Ashoka University, institutionalise evidence-based pedagogy and instructional leadership.
Aligning Pedagogy with Assessment for Outcome-Based Education
- Beyond Rote Evaluation: India’s examination-centric culture prioritises recall over cognition. Authentic assessments—portfolios, simulations, capstone projects—align with Bloom’s higher-order learning objectives.
- Learning-Outcome Mapping: Outcome-Based Education (OBE), endorsed by NBA and Washington Accord, ensures curricular coherence between teaching intent and assessment design.
- Industry-Academic Integration: NASSCOM (2024) reports persistent employability gaps despite rising degrees. Aligning pedagogy with industry-validated competencies bridges this structural mismatch.
- Formative Feedback Loops: Continuous assessment enables timely feedback, improving retention, critical thinking, and learner motivation.
Inclusivity and Reflective Learning as Pillars of Equitable Excellence
- From Access to Success: Second-generation reforms prioritise success metrics for SEDGs and Divyang students through assistive technologies, adaptive AI tutors, and universal design for learning (UDL).
- Multilingual and Cultural Inclusion: Platforms like Bhashini enable instruction across Indian languages, while integrating Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) ensures epistemic diversity and civilisational continuity.
- Reflective Learning Models: Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle—experience, reflection, conceptualisation, application—builds metacognition and problem-solving capacity essential for innovation-led economies.
- Mental Well-being and Cognitive Equity: WHO and UNICEF studies link student well-being with academic performance, necessitating counselling, mentoring, and balanced workloads.
Systemic Challenges and the Way Forward
- Regulatory Mindset Shift: Transitioning from compliance-centric regulation to trust-based academic autonomy remains essential.
- Sustained Public Investment: Achieving the 6% of GDP education target (Kothari Commission) is critical for faculty research, inclusive infrastructure, and innovation ecosystems.
- Leadership and Governance Capacity: Professional university leadership and differentiated academic roles enhance productivity without eroding autonomy.”
Conclusion
Echoing Justice D.Y. Chandrachud’s emphasis on constitutional capability-building, second-generation higher-education reforms must transform classrooms into engines of equity, excellence, and innovation—ensuring India’s demographic dividend matures into a global developmental asset.


