ForumIAS LATEST
- FRC 2027: SFG Residential program | accepting application for Tranche-2 Click Here to know more →
- CSAT Classes for Prelims 2027 by Rishi Bhargav sir starts 16 Nov. at 5 PM Click Here to know more →
- Prelims Sprint classes 2027: Starts 2nd Nov. at 4:30 PM | First class open to all. Click Here to know more →
Can India protect Rohingya, SC asks govt:
Context
Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, who leads the three-judge Bench rejects Centre’s stance that decision to deport the community is outside the domain of the Supreme Court
Government stand on rohingya’s refugee
- On August 8, 2017 center communicated to all the States to identify Rohingya and aid in their deportation.
- The government’s claims that the Rohingya refugees will eat into the resources meant for citizens
- Government is concerned on whether the country can sustain such an influx of refugees.
- The Centre claims that the Rohingya community is a threat to national security and easy prey for radicalisation.
Argument in favour of rohingya’s refugee
- The obligation to grant asylum was universal. “The Government of India has constantly made efforts to substantiate, enhance the rights of refugees.
- The fundamental right to life enshrined in Article 21 protects all “persons,” including refugees who fled persecution in their native countries.
- The Government of India has constantly made efforts to substantiate, enhance the rights of refugees. The August 8 communication is totally contradictory to Article 14.
- Humanitarian concerns of children, women, the sick and the old outweigh justiciability and cannot be viewed in the same light as “everyone
