NEWS
- 25 March | The Honest UPSC Talk Nobody Tells You Click Here to see Abhijit Asokan AIR 234 talk →
- 10 March | SFG Folks! This dude got Rank 7 in CSE 2025 with SFG! →
- 10 March | SFG Folks! She failed prelims 3 times. Then cleared the exam in one go! Watch Now! →
News: The Supreme Court held that a person converting to Christianity cannot claim Scheduled Caste protections, upholding the Andhra Pradesh High Court order.
About Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950

- It defines Scheduled Castes (SCs) and restricts their status based on specific religions under Article 341.
- Constitutional basis: It was issued by the President to provide protection against social disability arising from untouchability.
- Religious criteria: It initially restricted SC status to Hindus, later extended to Sikhs (1956) and Buddhists (1990), and now applies only to these three religions.
- Clause 3 (religious restriction): Paragraph 3 clearly states that no person professing a religion other than Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism shall be deemed a Scheduled Caste member.
- Territorial Nature: A caste recognised as SC in one State may not be recognised in another State or Union Territory.
- Relevant Constitutional Articles
- Article 341(1): It empowers the President to notify the list of Scheduled Castes.
- Article 341(2): It allows only Parliament to include or exclude any caste from the list.
- Article 366(24): It defines Scheduled Castes as those notified under Article 341.
- Articles 15(4) and 17: These provisions support advancement of Scheduled Castes and abolish untouchability.
- About SC Status after Supreme Court Ruling (2026)
- Background of the case: The case arose from a complaint filed in 2021 by a Christian pastor who alleged caste-based abuse and invoked provisions of the SC/ST Act.
- The accused argued that since he had converted to Christianity and was functioning as a pastor, he could not claim Scheduled Caste status.
- The Andhra Pradesh High Court in April 2025 accepted this argument and quashed the case.
- Supreme Court ruling (2026): Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision and held that a person who converts to Christianity cannot continue to claim Scheduled Caste status or related protections.
- Loss of status and mutual exclusivity: Conversion to non-specified religions leads to immediate loss of Scheduled Caste status, and such persons cannot simultaneously claim Scheduled Caste identity.
- Reconversion and proof requirement: The Court stated that to regain Scheduled Caste status after reconversion, a person must provide clear and credible proof of returning to the original religion and acceptance by the caste community, and mere self-declaration is not sufficient.
- Background of the case: The case arose from a complaint filed in 2021 by a Christian pastor who alleged caste-based abuse and invoked provisions of the SC/ST Act.




