Criminal defamation refers to a legal concept where a person intentionally and knowingly makes a false statement that harms the reputation of another individual or entity, with the intention of causing harm or damage to that person’s or entity’s reputation. This false statement may be in the form of spoken or written words, gestures, or other forms of communication.
Criminal defamation is a criminal offence and can lead to legal action against the person making the false statement. The laws surrounding criminal defamation vary from country to country, but in general, the act must be proven to be intentional and harmful to the reputation of the victim to constitute a criminal offence. Some countries have abolished criminal defamation laws, while others continue to enforce them.
Contents
Legal Framework
- The legal framework of criminal defamation in India is primarily governed by Section 499 and Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
- Defamation can be both a civil wrong and a criminal offence. A civil wrong is a tort, a wrongful act that causes harm or injury to someone’s reputation, character or good name.
- In a civil case, the person who has been defamed files a suit against the defamer seeking compensation for the damage caused to their reputation. While criminal law comes under Indian Penal Code (IPC) which seeks to punish a culprit with imprisonment, fine or both.
- Section 499 of the IPC defines defamation as any communication, either spoken or written or by the visible representation that imputes something to a person that may harm his /her reputation in the eyes of others to harm or with knowledge or belief that it will harm the reputation of the person against whom it is made. Section 500 of the IPC, states the punishment of Criminal Defamation, a bailable offence.
- The amount of fine and the term of imprisonment depend on the offence’s severity and the court’s discretion. In addition to the punishment, the person who has been defamed can also file a civil suit for damages to seek compensation for the harm caused to his or her reputation.
- Other than IPC
- CrPC outlines the procedures for prosecuting criminal offences, including criminal defamation.
- Indian Evidence Act outlines the rules for presenting evidence in court, including in cases of criminal defamation.
- Information Technology Act (IT Act) includes provisions related to online defamation and cybercrime, which can be used to prosecute cases of criminal defamation that occur on the internet.
- Right to Information Act (RTI Act) allows citizens to access government records and information, which can bs used to gather evidence in cases of criminal defamation. These laws work together to provide a legal framework for prosecuting cases of criminal defamation in India.
Civil vs Criminal Defamation
| CIVIL DEFAMATION | CRIMINAL DEFAMATION | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Elements of Criminal Defamation
- Publication: The statement must be published, either in writing or by spoken words, signs or gestures or by visible representation.
- False statement: The statement made must be false and must have the potential to harm the reputation of the person.
- Intention or knowledge: The person making the statement must have the intention to harm the reputation of the person or must have the knowledge that the statement is likely to harm the reputation of the person.
- Harm to reputation: The statement must have caused harm to the reputation of the person, either in the eyes of the public or among his or her acquaintances.
- Criminal intention: The person making the statement must have had the intention to commit the crime of defamation, which means that he or she must have intended to harm the reputation of the person.
If all these elements are satisfied, then the person making the statement can be charged with criminal defamation under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code.
Recent Cases
- Rahul Gandhi Case
- On April 13, 2019, Rahul Gandhi, the former President of Indian National Congress (INC) party, was sued for criminal defamation by a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader, for making a statement during an election rally in Kolar, Karnataka.
- Gandhi had accused the BJP of indulging in corruption, and specifically made a statement alleging that “all thieves have Modi in their surnames.” The former Gujarat Minister and BJP MLA, who shared the same surname lodged a criminal defamation case against Gandhi in a district court in Surat, Gujarat.
- The case was based on the grounds that the statement made by Gandhi was defamatory and had caused harm to the reputation to all people who share the same surname. After several hearings, on March 23, 2023 the Gujarat Court’s Judicial Magistrate held him guilty under Indian Penal Code Section 499 & 500 and sentenced to two years in Jail along with Rs. 15000 as fine.
- He was granted bail and suspended the sentence for 30 days to allow him to appeal in a higher court. This conviction impacted Rahul Gandhi as the disqualification of him as an MP (Member of Parliament) by Lok Sabha Secretariat.
- Subramanian Swamy vs. UOI, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of criminal defamation laws in India, stating that they are necessary to protect the reputation of individuals.
- Arvind Kejriwal vs. Nitin Gadkari, In 2014, Arvind Kejriwal, the founder of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and then Chief Minister of Delhi, was charged with criminal defamation for his comments about BJP leader Nitin Gadkari. Kejriwal had alleged that Gadkari was involved in corruption in his business dealings. However, the case was later dropped after Kejriwal apologized to Gadkari and agreed to withdraw his statements.
Criticisms
- Restriction on free speech: Criminal defamation laws impose restrictions on free speech and expression, which is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Indian Constitution. Critics argue that such laws can be used to silence legitimate criticism and dissent.
- Unequal application: Criminal defamation laws are often used by powerful individuals and institutions to silence their critics, while the less privileged may not have the same legal resources to defend themselves.
- Disproportionate punishment: The punishment for criminal defamation in India, which includes imprisonment and fines, is seen as disproportionate and excessive.
- Abuse of process: Criminal defamation laws can be used as a tool for harassment and intimidation by filing frivolous cases against individuals or organizations.
- International standards: International human rights organizations and experts have criticized criminal defamation laws and have called for their abolition, citing that they violate international standards of free expression.
- Limitation: There are certain limitations and exceptions to the application of the law of criminal defamation in India, such as the protection of public servants and fair comment on matters of public interest.
In recent years, there have been calls for the decriminalization of defamation in India, and some progress has been made towards this goal. In 2018, the Law Commission of India recommended the repeal of criminal defamation laws, but the government is yet to act on this recommendation.
United States
- In the United States, criminal defamation is not recognized as a federal offense, but some states have laws criminalizing defamation.
- However, the Supreme Court of the United States has established a high standard of proof for criminal defamation cases, requiring proof of “actual malice” or knowledge that the statement is false or made with reckless disregard for the truth.
United Kingdom
- In the United Kingdom, criminal defamation was abolished in 2010, and defamation cases are now handled under civil law.
- The Defamation Act 2013 established a new framework for defamation law, which includes measures to protect free speech and limit the use of defamation lawsuits to silence critics.
Canada
- In Canada, criminal defamation is recognized as an offence under the Criminal Code, but it is rarely used in practice.
- The Supreme Court of Canada has established a high threshold for criminal defamation cases, requiring proof of a high level of fault and harm to reputation.
Germany
- In Germany, criminal defamation is recognized as an offense under the Criminal Code, and the punishment can include imprisonment and fines.
- However, the German Constitution also provides strong protections for free speech, and criminal defamation cases are subject to strict requirements of proof.
Overall, many countries have moved towards decriminalizing defamation in recent years, recognizing the importance of protecting free speech while also providing legal remedies for harm to reputation.


