- Prelims Test Series (PTS) for Prelims 2027 starts 11th Oct. 2026 Click Here to know more →
- Ethics Redbook 3rd Edition: A Textbook That Teaches You How to Think Ethically Click Here to Read More →
- 21 Sept. | Forum Residential Coaching (FRC) for UPSC preparation Click Here to know more →
- 21 Sept. | GS Advance Program (GSAP) for UPSC 2027 Mains starts from 10th Oct. Click Here to Read More →
Contents
Relevance: Insolvency bankruptcy code and corporate failure
Synopsis: The failure of Insolvency bankruptcy code to achieve its intended objectives is dubbed as ‘isomorphic mimicry’ by developmental scholars.
What is ‘isomorphic mimicry’?
It is the tendency of governments to mimic (copy) other governments’ successes, replicating processes, systems, and even products of the “best practice” examples.
Issues pertaining to the IBC
Global investors were genuinely excited by India’s 2016 insolvency law, hoping to profit from bad loans. Initial success with distressed steel plants raised hopes that the savings-starved economy would extricate valuable capital from failed ventures.
But now, IBC is challenged by
- Low recovery rate (90% haircuts)
- Lack of bailout funds
- Long delays in admitting cases by tribunals
- Shortage of judges: Across the country, 27 tribunals are being run by 29 judges, at least 25 short of what’s required. Many have no experience in financial matters. Insolvency courts also adjudicate unrelated matters under the Companies Act, overwhelming an already strained system. Delays abound, not just in approving a sale or liquidation in 270 days as the law proposed originally (it was later increased to 330 days), but even in admitting cases.
Way forward
It’s still not too late to fix the bankruptcy regime. Maybe it will happen only once the state is no longer a dominant player in the lending market.
