Karnataka: Supreme Court upholds disqualification of 17 rebel MLAs, can contest bypolls
Red Book
Red Book

Interview Guidance Program (IGP) for UPSC CSE 2024, Registrations Open Click Here to know more and registration

News:The Supreme Court(SC) has upheld an order by former Karnataka Assembly Speaker disqualifying 17 Karnataka MLAs.However,the court has allowed all the disqualified MLAs to contest in the upcoming bypolls.

Facts:

Background:

  • Karnataka Assembly Speaker had disqualified 17 MLAs under the tenth schedule of the Constitution(anti defection law).
  • The disqualification had barred the legislators from contesting Assembly polls for the term of the current Assembly which ends in 2023.
  • However,the Supreme Court upheld the disqualification of the dissident legislators but it also held that their ouster does not put any bar upon them from contesting by-polls.
  • The court said that the speaker acts as a quasi-judicial authority and that the scope of the assembly speaker’s inquiry is limited to examine whether the resignation of MLAs was voluntary or not.
  • It said that even the 91st Amendment Act,2003 which did not allow a disqualified member to be appointed as a minister,did not give Speaker the power to put a ban upon them to contest elections till the end of the term.

Additional information:

About Anti-Defection law:

  • The Anti-defection law is contained in the 10th Schedule of the Constitution.It was enacted by Parliament in 1985.
  • The purpose of the anti-defection law is to curb political defection by the legislators.The law applies to both Parliament and state assemblies.
  • It lays down the process by which legislators may be disqualified on grounds of defection by the Presiding Officer of a legislature based on a petition by any other member of the House.
  • However,the law does not specify a timeframe for Speakers to decide on defection proceedings.

Grounds for Disqualification:The grounds on which a member of a legislature can be disqualified are:

  • if he/she voluntarily gives up the membership of his/her party 
  • if a legislator votes in the House against the direction of his/her party and his/her actions are not condoned by his party.
  • If an independent candidate joins a political party after the election. 
  • If a nominated member joins a party six months after he becomes a member of the legislature.

Exception:

  • There is an exception that has been provided in the law to protect the legislators from disqualification.
  • The 10th Schedule says that if there is a merger between two political parties and two-thirds of the members of a legislature party agree to the merger, they will not be disqualified.

Judicial Review:

  • In Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu and Others (1991),the Supreme Court Constitution Bench had declared that the Speaker’s decision was subject to judicial review.
  • The Speaker of the House also does not have the power to review his own decisions to disqualify a candidate.Such power is not provided for under the Schedule and is not implicit in the provisions either.


Discover more from Free UPSC IAS Preparation Syllabus and Materials For Aspirants

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community