ForumIAS announcing GS Foundation Program for UPSC CSE 2025-26 from 26th June. Click Here for more information.
No need for privacy in court, says SC(TH)
Context
SC has given a thumbs-up for audio and video recording of court proceedings
Background
In August 2017, the Supreme Court Bench of Justices Goel and U.U. Lalit had, suggested possibilities of having audio and video recordings of proceedings in the constitutional courts the Supreme Court and the high courts
- Rationale: Judges had stated that other countries do not consider recording of proceedings as a violation of privacy of court.
- Global example:U.S. Supreme Court has video and audio recordings of its proceedings
Previous order
- Installation of CCTVs: In Mar 17, SC had ordered that CCTVs (without audio recording) should be installed inside courtrooms and at vantage points within court complexes in at least two districts across States and Union Territories
- Location of monitor:In the chamber of the District and Session Judge concerned
- Not under the ambit of RTI: The footage of the CCTV camera will not be available under the RTI and will not be supplied to anyone without permission of the High Court concerned
Will it help?
Court proceedings have been a secret affair until now. Audio & Video recording of the proceedings is a step in the right direction to ensure transparency in the judiciary.
