ForumIAS LATEST
- Prelims Test Series (PTS) for Prelims 2027 starts 11th Oct. 2026 Click Here to know more →
- [Pre-order] Ethics Redbook 3rd Edition: Delivery starts from 10th October onwards Click Here to Read More →
- 21 Sept. | Forum Residential Coaching (FRC) for UPSC preparation Click Here to know more →
- 21 Sept. | GS Advance Program (GSAP) for UPSC 2027 Mains starts from 10th Oct. Click Here to Read More →
- In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has upheld the Sections 23(1) and 23(2) of the Preconception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) (PCN-PNDT) Act, 1994. It criminalises non-maintenance of medical records by obstetricians and gynaecologists and suspend their medical licence indefinitely.
- The judgement came in the backdrop of a petition filed by Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI) which said that Section 23 equated anomalies in paperwork/record keeping/clerical errors on the same footing with the actual offence of sex determination.
- The Supreme Court has observed that any dilution of any provisions of the Act would defeat the purpose of the Act and relegate the right to life of the girl child under Article 21 of the Constitution, to a mere formality.
- The PC-PNDT Act was enacted in 1994 with the intent to prohibit prenatal diagnostic techniques for determination of the sex of the foetus leading to female feticide.
- Female foeticide is the process of finding out the sex of the foetus and undergoing abortion if it is a female.
- Sex-selected abortions is a grave concern in India. In a publication of United Nations population Fund (UNFPA), it was published that 0.46 million girls were missing at birth on an average annually during the period 20012012 as a result of sexselective abortions.



