ForumIAS announcing GS Foundation Program for UPSC CSE 2025-26 from 26th June. Click Here for more information.
Source: The post India’s toy industry has been created, based on the article “The truth about India’s booming toy exports” published in “The Hindu” on 24th January 2024.
UPSC Syllabus Topic: GS paper 3- Indian economy- changes in industrial policy and their effects on industrial growth.
News: The article discusses how India’s toy industry became a net exporter since 2020-21.
What is the current state of India’s toy industry?
Net Exporter Status: The trade balance was negative ₹1,500 crore in 2014-15, which turned positive from 2020-21 after a gap of 23 years.
Significant Export Growth: There was a 239% increase in toy exports between 2014-15 and 2022-23.
Decline in Imports: Imports of toys decreased by 52% in the same period.
Rise in Import Duty: Customs duty on toys was raised from 20% to 60% in 2020 and then to 70% in 2023.
What are the factors responsible for the improvement of India’s toy industry?
Protectionist Policies: The shift in the toy industry’s performance is attributed to the government’s protectionist measures, such as increased tariffs and import restrictions.
Implementation of Non-Tariff Barriers: The introduction of quality control orders and mandatory testing for each import consignment made it tougher for foreign toys to enter the Indian market.
Global Supply Chain Disruption: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global supply chains, affecting toy imports and indirectly benefiting domestic producers.
Government Initiatives: The ‘Make in India’ campaign, initiated in 2014, aimed to boost domestic manufacturing, which included the toy industry.
What are the major concerns related to India’s toy industry?
Over-Reliance on Protectionism: The industry’s growth is attributed to high import duties and trade barriers, which may not be viable long-term strategies. Prolonged reliance on protectionist measures might hinder the industry’s global competitiveness.
Limited Improvement in Domestic Production: There’s been no significant enhancement in domestic toy manufacturing, with labor productivity declining from ₹7.5 lakh per worker in 2014-15 to ₹5 lakh in 2019-20.
Potential for Rent-Seeking Behavior: There’s a concern that continuous protective measures could lead to inefficiencies and focus on maintaining government support instead of improving productivity or innovation.
What should be done?
Complementing Protectionism with Investment: Pair protectionist policies with investment in the toy industry to enhance productivity and innovation.
Focus on Domestic Capability Expansion: Invest in developing local manufacturing capabilities, considering the lack of significant improvement in domestic toy production.
Providing Industry-Specific Infrastructure: Develop public infrastructure tailored to the needs of the toy industry to support its growth.
Preventing Policy Entrenchment: Avoid the long-term entrenchment of protectionist policies, which could lead to inefficiency and rent-seeking behavior.
Transparent Policy Review and Dialogue: Make research studies like the IIM-L report public for better policy understanding and effective decision-making.
Question for practice:
What are the key factors responsible for the improvement of India’s toy industry, and what are the major concerns associated with it?
