Pakistan’s role in Terrorism and related International Challenges

Quarterly-SFG-Jan-to-March
SFG FRC 2026

Source: The post “Pakistan’s role in Terrorism and related International Challenges” has been created, based on the article “An anti-terror role that defies logic” published in “The Hindu” on 30 September 2025. Pakistan’s role in Terrorism and related International Challenges.

Pakistan's role in Terrorism and related International Challenges

UPSC Syllabus: GS-3- Security Challenges and their Management in Border Areas – Linkages of Organized Crime with Terrorism.

Context: Pakistan has long been accused of providing safe havens and logistical support to terrorist organizations like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM). Its role in cross-border terrorism and regional instability has repeatedly drawn international attention, raising questions about the effectiveness of global counter-terrorism mechanisms.

Pakistan’s Role in Terrorism:

  1. Terror Shelter: Pakistan continues to harbor terrorists, including UN-designated individuals like Hafiz Saeed. The country’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies have often been complicit or passive in countering these groups.
  2. Strategic Manipulation: Pakistan leverages its military and Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) networks to support terrorist operations while publicly projecting itself as a responsible global actor.
  3. Diplomatic Maneuvering: By influencing UN committees such as the Counter-Terrorism Committee, Pakistan exploits gaps in international oversight, often blocking measures against itself.

Challenges for the UN and Global Community:

  1. Credibility Gap: Pakistan’s election to lead key UN committees despite evidence of terror links undermines the UN’s impartiality and commitment to counter-terrorism.
  2. Geopolitical Pressures: Powerful nations often shield Pakistan for strategic or economic reasons, complicating enforcement of sanctions and accountability.
  3. Humanitarian and Economic Dilemmas: International funding, like IMF loans, sometimes faces scrutiny due to concerns about potential misuse for terror financing.

Implications for India:

  1. Security Threats: Pakistan-based groups have orchestrated attacks like Pulwama, directly threatening Indian security and public safety.
  2. Diplomatic Constraints: Pakistan’s influence in UN bodies often limits India’s capacity to push for international sanctions or actions against terrorists.
  3. Global Narrative: Pakistan attempts to shape narratives around terrorism and regional stability, potentially deflecting blame onto India or justifying its proxy strategies.

Measures for India:

  1. Strategic Diplomacy: Leverage alliances within the UN and other multilateral forums to counter Pakistan’s influence and highlight its terror links.
  2. Counter-Terrorism Policies: Strengthen intelligence sharing, cybersecurity measures, and targeted sanctions against Pakistan-based entities.
  3. International Engagement: Conduct proactive campaigns involving global media, academia, and diaspora to expose Pakistan’s role in terrorism.
  4. Humanitarian and Strategic Balancing: Ensure India’s participation in humanitarian missions and UN processes to assert credibility while monitoring Pakistan’s activities.

Conclusion: Pakistan’s dual strategy of sponsoring terrorism while projecting itself as a responsible global actor poses significant challenges for India and the international community. A combination of strategic diplomacy, robust intelligence measures, and international advocacy is essential for India to counter Pakistan’s influence and strengthen global counter-terrorism efforts.

Question: Critically examine Pakistan’s role in global terrorism and the challenges it poses to India and the UN. Suggest measures for India to counter these challenges.

Print Friendly and PDF
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Blog
Academy
Community