Q. Consider the following pairs:
PersonDescription of Indian federation
1. K C WheareQuasi-federal
2. Granville Austin Co-operative federalism
3. Morris JonesFederation with a centralising tendency
4. Ivor JenningsBargaining federalism
Which of the pairs given above is/are not correctly matched?
Red Book
Red Book

[A] Only one pair

[B] Only two pairs

[C] Only three pairs

[D] All four pairs

Answer: B
Notes:

Federal System with Unitary Bias The Constitution of India establishes a federal system of government. It contains all the usual features of a federation, viz., two government, division of powers, written Constitution, supermacy of Constitution, rigidity of Constitution, independent judiciary and bicameralism.

However, the Indian Constitution also contains a large number of unitary or non-federal features, viz., a strong Centre, single Constitution, single citizenship, flexibility of Constitution, integrated judiciary, appointment of state governor by the Centre, all-India services, emergency provisions, and so on.

Moreover, the term ‘Federation’ has nowhere been used in the Constitution. Article 1, on the other hand, describes India as a ‘Union of States’ which implies two things: one, Indian Federation is not the result of an agreement by the states; and two, no state has the right to secede from the federation.

Hence, the Indian Constitution has been variously described as ‘federal in form but unitary in spirit’, ‘quasi-federal’ by K C Wheare, ‘bargaining federalism’ by Morris Jones, ‘co-operative federalism’ by Granville Austin, ‘federation with a centralising tendenc’ by Ivor Jennings, and so on.

Source: Indian Polity by Laxmikanth

Blog
Academy
Community