Q. Consider the following statements:
1.The writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is exclusive.
2.The writ jurisdiction of the high court is wider than that of the Supreme Court.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

[A] 1 only

[B] 2 only

[C] Both 1 and 2

[D] Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: B
Notes:

Explanation: There is also a difference between the writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and that of the high court.

  • The Supreme Court can issue writs only for the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights and not for other purposes.
  • The high court, on the other hand, can issue writs not only for the enforcement of the fundamental rights but also for other purposes.
  • It means that the writ jurisdiction of the high court is wider than that of the Supreme Court.
  • The Supreme Court is empowered to issue writs including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari for the enforcement of the fundamental rights of an aggrieved citizen.
  • In this regard, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in the sense that an aggrieved citizen can directly go to the Supreme Court, not necessarily by way of appeal.
  • However, the writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not exclusive.

Source: Laxmikanth

Blog
Academy
Community