Q. Consider the following statements:
1. Article 1 of Indian Constitution describes India as a Union of States rather than a Federation of States.
2. There was unanimity in the Constituent Assembly with regard to the name of the country.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Answer: A
Notes:
Article 1 describes India, that is, Bharat as a ‘Union of States’ rather than a ‘Federation of States’.
- This provision deals with two things: one, name of the country, and two, type of polity.
- There was no unanimity in the Constituent Assembly with regard to the name of the country. Some members suggested the traditional name (Bharat) while other advocated the modern name (India).
- Hence, the Constituent Assembly had to adopt a mix of both (‘India, that is, Bharat’)
- Secondly, the country is described as ‘Union’ although its Constitution is federal in structure.
- According to Dr B R Ambedkar, the phrase ‘Union of States’ has been preferred to ‘Federation of States’ for two reasons: one, the Indian Federation is not the result of an agreement among the states like the American Federation; and two, the states have no right to secede from the federation.
- The federation is a Union because it is indestructible. The country is an integral whole and divided into different states only for the convenience of administration.
Source: Laxmikanth.

