Q. With reference to Eco Sensitive Zone (ESZ), consider the following statements:
1.An ESZ has stricter regulations compared to a National Park.
2.The buffer zone concept in ESZ management refers to an area where stricter regulations apply to minimize impacts on the core zone.
3.Economic potential and development prospects are among the factors considered for designation as an ESZ.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation –
Statements 1 and 3 are incorrect. National Parks are designated areas for wildlife conservation, and they have the highest level of protection among protected areas in India. On the other hand, Eco-Sensitive Zones are areas around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries that are identified as fragile ecosystems in need of conservation and protection. While ESZs have regulations to protect the environment, they are generally less stringent than those in a National Park.
Economic potential and development prospects are not among the factors considered for designation as an ESZ. Rather, factors such as the presence of endangered species and unique habitats, ecological fragility and susceptibility to degradation, and cultural and religious significance of the area are considered.
Statement 2 is correct. The buffer zone concept in ESZ management refers to an area surrounding the core zone where stricter regulations apply to minimize the impact on the core zone’s environment. The buffer zone acts as a transition area between the core zone and the outside environment, helping to mitigate the impact of human activities on the fragile ecosystem of the core zone.
Source: Forum IAS