Q. With reference to the In-House Procedure in the Indian judiciary, consider the following statements:
1.It is designed to investigate complaints of misconduct against judges of the higher judiciary and recommend appropriate actions.
2.The President of India reviews complaints against High Court judges and determines whether an inquiry is necessary.
3.The committee for in-house procedure consists of two Chief Justices from other High Courts and one High Court judge.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanations –
Statements 1 and 3 are correct. The In-House Procedure, established by the Supreme Court in 1999, provides a mechanism to address allegations of judicial misconduct that fall short of impeachment. It allows for an internal inquiry into complaints against judges and recommends actions such as advising resignation, retirement, or initiating removal proceedings. If a deeper probe is warranted, a three-member committee is formed, comprising two Chief Justices from other High Courts and one High Court judge, to ensure impartiality during the inquiry.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Complaints against High Court judges are reviewed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) or the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court, not the President. The President’s role comes into play only if impeachment proceedings are initiated following the inquiry.
Source: The Hindu
Discover more from Free UPSC IAS Preparation Syllabus and Materials For Aspirants
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
