[Questions] Mains Marathon I Daily Answer Writing I October 13th, 2022

Quarterly-SFG-Jan-to-March
SFG FRC 2026

Good Morning Friends,

Following are today’s Mains Marathon Questions.

About Mains Marathon – This is an initiative of ForumIAS to help/aid aspirants in their writing skills, which is crucial to conquering mains examination.

Every morning, we post 2-3 questions based on current affairs. The questions framed are meaningful and relevant to the exam.

Write your answers in the comment box, given below. 

For Mains Marathon Archives click HERE

Questions

Do you think that the Collegium system is in urgent need of reforms? Give reasons for your opinion.  

The Hindu 

In light of the present situation, highlight the challenges and India’s approach to Multilateralism.  

ForumIAS blog 

Print Friendly and PDF
guest

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ruchi
Ruchi
3 years ago

Please review and let me know my mistakescomment imagecomment image

PinkFloyd
PinkFloyd
3 years ago
Reply to  Ruchi

Looks great! In the introduction, do add Higher Judiciary (Judges are selected by exam etc. for lower courts). Also in transparency mention there is no clarity on eligibility and selection criteria, merit etc. You can also mention practices in other mature democracies like the UK (Judicial Appointments Commission) and the US (President/Senate).

Ruchi
Ruchi
3 years ago
Reply to  PinkFloyd

Right! Will add the points. Thanku for the review

Jessy
Jessy
3 years ago

comment imagecomment image

PinkFloyd
PinkFloyd
3 years ago
Reply to  Jessy

You should work on the structure of sentences. The collegium system could have been defined better. Also include points like lack of clarity on parameters/basis of selection, lack of accountability. In suggestions do mention independent Judicial Appointments Commission in the UK, same can be adopted in India (though SC had overturned NJAC).

Jessy
Jessy
3 years ago

comment imagecomment image

Raghav
Raghav
3 years ago

comment image

Raghav
Raghav
3 years ago
Reply to  Raghav

comment image

PinkFloyd
PinkFloyd
3 years ago
Reply to  Raghav

Good answer! It is a good practice to begin with proper definition or a relevant fact, which you followed. In content, there is a scope for some improvements e.g., mention ineffective ‘multilateral institutions’ like UN, WHO, instead of multilateralism; lack of enforcement mechanisms, Rising protectionism, ‘Every country for itself’ or GZERO etc.
In suggestions also, add keywords like Strategic autonomy, national/strategic interests etc. India’s approach is based on protecting its interests and taking principled stands. Briefly mention India’s stance on Climate/WTO issues etc.

Raghav
Raghav
3 years ago
Reply to  PinkFloyd

Thank you sir , this is my first answer and first review

Mukesh
Mukesh
3 years ago

comment imagecomment imagecomment image

PinkFloyd
PinkFloyd
3 years ago
Reply to  Mukesh

Great answer! Just add that there is lack of accountability under the present system. Also while describing collegium system, mention it is for higher judiciary.

Ashwin Sahu
Ashwin Sahu
3 years ago

comment imagecomment imagecomment image

PinkFloyd
PinkFloyd
3 years ago
Reply to  Ashwin Sahu

Great answer! I think the point of post-retirement engagements can be avoided as it is not related to collegium system. In the point related to checks, add the system is not accountable at present. Rest is good!

Proton
Proton
3 years ago

Please reviewcomment imagecomment image

PinkFloyd
PinkFloyd
3 years ago
Reply to  Proton

Good answer! In introduction, You can briefly define collegium system and its evolution. 2-3 lines like consists of 1+4 senior most judges and evolved through Judicial pronouncements etc. Add the point of lack of transparency regarding selection criteria, what factors are considered for selection/rejection etc.
In suggestions, mention system like that in the UK can be adopted in India as well.

Goms
Goms
3 years ago

comment imagecomment image

PinkFloyd
PinkFloyd
3 years ago
Reply to  Goms

Great answer! Do mention ‘higher judiciary’ after appointment/transfer of judges. Also while mentioning points that can have judgmental overtones You can add a line like ‘experts/critics are of the opinion’ that it promotes nepotism. Rest is great!

Goms
Goms
3 years ago

comment imagecomment image

Blog
Academy
Community