Source: The post RBI committee keeps rates steady amid uncertainty has been created, based on the article “RBI has done well to focus on its core competence: Price stability” published in “Live mint” on 7th August 2025. RBI committee keeps rates steady amid uncertainty.
UPSC Syllabus Topic: GS Paper 3- Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilisation, of resources, growth, development and employment.
Context: On August 6, 2025, the RBI’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) chose to keep the repo rate unchanged at 5.5% amid global uncertainties. Despite earlier aggressive rate cuts, the MPC signaled a pause, acknowledging the limits of monetary policy in managing growth during tariff-driven instability.
A Shift Toward Caution
- Maintaining Neutrality Amid Global Instability: The MPC unanimously chose a status quo on interest rates, aligning with other major central banks. The stance reflects caution in the face of trade uncertainties, especially those triggered by tariff tensions.
- Recognising the Limits of Monetary Action: Governor Sanjay Malhotra admitted the unpredictable impact of tariffs. The MPC acknowledged it had limited space left to support growth after successive rate cuts earlier this year.
- Restraint as a Strategic Choice: Like leaving a ball in Test cricket, the MPC’s restraint was portrayed as intelligent policy. Despite reducing inflation projections, it did not pursue further cuts, avoiding premature policy moves.
Reconsidering Past Rate Cuts
- Bias Toward Growth Now Tempered: The MPC had earlier shown a bias for supporting growth, reducing the repo rate thrice in 2025. The June cut of 50 bps and a 100 bps CRR reduction bordered on adventurism.
- Concerns Over Policy Overreach: Aggressive cuts may have weakened household financial savings, while credit growth stayed subdued. The rise in corporate credit did not translate into bank credit growth, raising doubts about monetary policy’s effectiveness.
- Credit Dynamics and Structural Constraints: If weak credit demand is structural, not cyclical, monetary policy tools may be ineffective. Easy money might instead be diverted to riskier retail lending, endangering financial stability.
Limitations of Inflation Data
- Misleading Comfort in Low Inflation: Retail inflation hit a 77-month low of 2.1% in June, but this was due to high base effects and low food inflation. The June resolution ignored this distortion.
- Correcting Past Oversights: The August resolution explicitly acknowledged base effects and predicted CPI inflation could exceed 4% by Q4 2025-26. Core inflation also showed a rising trend, averaging 4.3% in Q1.
Wider Economic Headwinds
1.,Rupee Depreciation and Import Price Pressures: With the rupee falling to a record ₹87.8 per dollar, and tensions with the US over Russian oil and arms, import inflation is expected to rise, affecting domestic prices.
- Relying on Fiscal Policy for Growth: Even if growth slows, the remedy lies with fiscal policy, not monetary interventions. The MPC reaffirmed that central banks should focus on potential growth, guided by data.
Conclusion
The RBI’s MPC has now returned to a path of cautious decision-making. In uncertain times, restraint and data dependence have prevailed over adventurism, preserving monetary credibility while allowing space for fiscal policy to act.
Question for practice:
Evaluate the reasons behind the RBI Monetary Policy Committee’s decision to maintain a status quo on interest rates in August 2025.
