Pre-cum-Mains GS Foundation Program for UPSC 2026 | Starting from 5th Dec. 2024 Click Here for more information
SC clears 12 special courts to try cases against politicians
Context
The Supreme Court on Wednesday gave the green signal for the Centre’s scheme to set up 12 fast track courts to exclusively prosecute and dispose of 1,581 criminal cases pending against Members of Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies within a year.
Allocation of funds
- A Bench of Justices directed the Centre to forthwith allocate ₹7.8 crore to the States for setting up such courts.
- The Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, has granted in-principle approval to the said allocation
Timeline
The States shall, in consultation with the High Courts concerned, make the courts operational by March 1, 2018
Still not enough
PIL petitioner and Supreme Court advocate Ashwini Upadhyay said 12 courts were not enough to try 1,581 cases and ₹7.8 crore was too little to prosecute “criminal” politicians.
But Its’ a start
To this, Justice Gogoi responded that 12 courts are not the end of it. But let them start. It is very easy to blame, but to start something is difficult
Declared cases
The 1,581 criminal cases were declared by politicians in their nominations in the 2014 general elections.
Cases to be clubbed together
- The scheme proposes to club the cases of several politicians together and have one court hear them
- This way, the Bench expected a special court to finish at least 100 cases a year.
Trace out pending cases
The Supreme Court directed the High Courts, acting through the various trial courts, to trace out from the case records the criminal cases pending against politicians and transfer them to the special courts concerned for adjudication.
At rudimentary stage
The Supreme Court said the Centre’s scheme was “rudimentary” at this stage, but it would be open for modifications as and when the situation arises.
The Case
The order comes on a petition filed by Mr. Upadhyay for a life ban on convicted politicians from contesting elections
Next Hearing
The court said it would consider the issue in the next hearing in March.
