SC modifies order on ESZ around protected forests

sfg-2026
ForumIAS LATEST
      1. SFG FRC 2027 | Program starts from 18th Dec. 2026 | Admissions open for Entrance Test Click Here to know more →
      2. Prelims Test Series (PTS) for Prelims 2027 starts 11th Oct. 2026 Click Here to know more →
      3. [Pre-order] Ethics Redbook 3rd Edition: Delivery starts from 10th October onwards Click Here to Read More →
      4. 21 Sept. | GS Advance Program (GSAP) for UPSC 2027 Mains starts from 11th Oct. Click Here to Read More →

Source: The post is based on the article “SC modifies order on ESZ around protected forests” published in The Hindu on 26th April 2023

What is the News?

The Supreme Court has modified its 2022 order which directed that each protected forest such as national parks and wildlife sanctuaries must have an eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) of one kilometre.

What was the case about?

In June 2022, the Supreme Court had directed all national parks and wildlife sanctuaries falling under protected forests to earmark a minimum distance of one kilometer as ESZ where prohibited activities, including mining and establishment of any new permanent structure, will not be permitted.

However, the Centre and several States had returned to the court seeking modification of the June 2022 judgment saying the judicial direction affected hundreds of villages on the peripheries of forests.

What did the Supreme Court rule?

The Supreme Court has modified its 2022 judgment to have mandatory eco-sensitive zones (ESZ) of a minimum of one kilometre around protected forests, national parks and wildlife sanctuaries across the country.

The court reasoned that ESZ cannot be uniform across the country and has to be “protected area-specific”.

The court said such a stringent observance of the June 2022 judgment would cause more harm than good. This will also increase man-animal conflict rather than abate it.

Henceforth, the 2022 order will not be applicable to ESZs in respect to which draft and final notifications have been issued by the MoEFCC, and where proposals for such notifications have been received by the ministry.

It will also not be applicable where the national parks and sanctuaries are located on inter-state borders or share common boundaries.

However, the court made it clear that mining within the national park and wildlife sanctuary and within an area of one kilometer from the boundary of such national park and wildlife sanctuary shall not be permissible.

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community