Pre-cum-Mains GS Foundation Program for UPSC 2026 | Starting from 5th Dec. 2024 Click Here for more information
Source: The post SC observation on National Park conservation practices has been created, based on the article “A slippery slope: Tourism in wildlife parks should not be at odds with conservation efforts” published in “The Hindu” on 8th March 2024.
UPSC Syllabus Topic: GS Paper 3-ecology and environment- conservation
News: The Supreme Court (SC) criticized the Uttarakhand government for allowing about 6,000 trees to be cut in Jim Corbett National Park.
What is the SC observation on National Park conservation practices?
The Supreme Court stated that cutting trees in National Park violates conservation practices and harms the ecosystem, especially tiger habitats.
It emphasized the importance of tigers in maintaining ecosystem health.
The Court pointed out loud music from nearby resorts posing threats to animals, indicating poor regulation around safari zones.
The Court observed that tiger safaris are acceptable if they adhere to eco-tourism guidelines and not just for commercial gains.
It highlighted the risk of political and financial misuse in the management of tiger safaris.
The Court pointed out the need for balanced tourism that supports conservation, citing the example of cheetah translocation in Kuno National Park.
How do Tiger Safaris impact National Park conservation practices?
- Properly managed tiger safaris can divert attention from forest core zones and help in raising awareness about conservation. Yet, improper management can lead to environmental damage.
- While tiger safaris and projects like the translocation of cheetahs to Kuno National Park can boost local employment and tourism, they need to be balanced with conservation needs to avoid negative impacts.
What should be done?
1.The Supreme Court recommends developing clear guidelines for conducting tiger safaris, ensuring they align with conservation goals.
2.Wildlife safaris should be managed to minimize impact on core zones, promoting the forest’s inviolate nature.
Question for practice:
Examine the Supreme Court’s stance on tiger safaris and their impact on National Park conservation practices.
