ForumIAS LATEST
- SFG FRC 2027 | Program starts from 19th Dec. 2026 | Admissions open for Entrance Test Click Here to know more →
- Prelims Test Series (PTS) for Prelims 2027 starts 11th Oct. 2026 Click Here to know more →
- [Pre-order] Ethics Redbook 3rd Edition: Delivery starts from 10th October onwards Click Here to Read More →
- 21 Sept. | GS Advance Program (GSAP) for UPSC 2027 Mains starts from 11th Oct. Click Here to Read More →
SC seeks plan to eradicate leprosy
News:
- Recently, the Supreme Court gave directions to the government for eradicating leprosy.
Important facts:
2. The apex court gave the following directions to the government :
- Chief Justice says it the duty of the state to erase the stigma against leprosy.
- The government need to constitute a separate wing to create public awareness that leprosy is curable and not contagious.
- The court said the “primary duty of the state to erase the stigma against those suffering from leprosy and nudge them back into the mainstream.”
- The court ordered All India Ratio and Doordarshan to air programmes nationally as well as regionally in States.
- Afflicted persons could not be exposed to stigma which denuded them of basic human dignity.
- Persons suffering from leprosy deserved the empathy from authorities as well as the society at large.
- The court said that deserved to be treated with equality.
- Previously, the court had asked the Centre and the States to remove references to leprosy as a disability from statute books because written laws amounted to “statutory stigma”.
3. The Centre is taking steps to eradicate leprosy. So far following steps has been taken :
- The court directed the government to spread the awareness campaign up to the ‘gram panchayat’ level. It would help in eradicating the disease and ending discrimination against sufferers.
- Steps were being taken to repeal legal provisions in laws which discriminated against leprosy patients.
- The government is taking steps to delete the provisions from number of enactments which cast stigma on the persons.
- The court referred to the 256th Law Commission’s report and said the recommendation on repealing discriminatory legal provisions had not been acted upon by the Centre and States.



