- SFG FRC 2027 | Program starts from 19th Dec. 2026 | Admissions open for Entrance Test Click Here to know more →
- Prelims Test Series (PTS) for Prelims 2027 starts 11th Oct. 2026 Click Here to know more →
- [Pre-order] Ethics Redbook 3rd Edition: Delivery starts from 10th October onwards Click Here to Read More →
- 21 Sept. | GS Advance Program (GSAP) for UPSC 2027 Mains starts from 11th Oct. Click Here to Read More →
Source: The post is based on the article “Unnecessary Mystery
Judges recusing from cases without specifying reasons hurts the entire judiciary. SC must frame rules” published in The Times of India on 14th November 2022.
Syllabus: GS – 2 – Structure, organization and functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary.
Relevance: About the recusal of judges.
News: Many times Supreme Court or high court judges recuse themselves from cases. Recently, a judge recused from hearing Bilkis Bano’s challenge against the premature release of 11 murder-gangrape convicts.
What is the recusal of judges?
Recusal is the removal of oneself as a judge or policymaker in a particular matter. Ordinarily judges recuse over conflict of interest. However, often judges don’t give reasons for recusal.
| Must read: Explained: How judges recuse from cases, and why |
What are the concerns associated with the recusal of judges?
a) Judges recusing from cases without specifying reasons hurts the entire judiciary, b) The frequency of recusal pleas are also growing recently. For instance, rarely a month passes without a judge recusing in Bombay HC.
What should be done to reduce recusal of judges?
-A judicial order would make recusal legally contestable at a higher forum but “procedural and substantive rules” were needed.
-Judges should state their reasons for recusal from the cases. Every judge would have to comply to this.
If these changes are implemented, the entire judicial system would greatly benefit from the resultant transparency.
