‘Court had no business to dilute Act’

sfg-2026
ForumIAS LATEST
    1. Prelims Test Series (PTS) for Prelims 2027 starts 11th Oct. 2026 Click Here to know more →
    2. [Pre-order] Ethics Redbook 3rd Edition: Delivery starts from 10th October onwards Click Here to Read More →
    3. 21 Sept. | Forum Residential Coaching (FRC) for UPSC preparation Click Here to know more →
    4. 21 Sept. | GS Advance Program (GSAP) for UPSC 2027 Mains starts from 10th Oct. Click Here to Read More →

‘Court had no business to dilute Act’

What has happened?

In its review petition filed before the Supreme Court on Monday, the Centre said the court had no business to dilute the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and make it easier for accused persons to escape arrest.

SC’s view

The Act is weakly implemented instead of being misused as the conviction rate is low

Changes made by SC:

  • Anticipatory bail: To allow accused persons under the Act to apply for anticipatory bail under Section 18 of the Act
  • Preliminary enquiry: An FIR should be registered only after a “preliminary inquiry” was held by a Deputy Superintendent of Police to check if the complaint was “frivolous”

Government’s view

The reason of low conviction rate

Delay in lodging the FIR, hostile witnesses and complainants, absence of proper scrutiny of cases by the prosecution before filing charge sheet and lack of proper presentation and appreciation of evidence by the court

Effect of introducing preliminary enquiry

Only reduce the rate of registration of cases, conviction, increase pendency and per se serve as a deterrent in filing FIR

Heinous crimes are committed against SC/STs: So no violation of Article 21

Objecting to the court’s reasoning that non-availability of anticipatory bail was violative of Article 21 (fundamental right to personal liberty), the government reminded that offences under the Act are “heinous crimes committed to humiliate and subjugate members of the SCs/STs with a view to keep them in a state of servitude.”

Section 18 is a deterrent

Section 18 of the Act is its “backbone” as it enforces an inherent deterrence and instils a sense of protection among members of the SCs/STs

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community