ForumIAS announcing GS Foundation Program for UPSC CSE 2025-26 from 19 April. Click Here for more information.
ForumIAS Answer Writing Focus Group (AWFG) for Mains 2024 commencing from 24th June 2024. The Entrance Test for the program will be held on 28th April 2024 at 9 AM. To know more about the program visit: https://forumias.com/blog/awfg2024
Source: The post implication of recent Supreme Court decision has been created, based on the article “Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes: On recent Supreme Court verdicts, hold the celebrations” published in “The Hindu” on 23rd February 2024.
UPSC Syllabus Topic: GS Paper 2 – Indian Polity – Powers, functions and responsibilities of various Constitutional Bodies
News: The article discusses recent Supreme Court decisions in India that challenge government actions. These rulings are seen as rare steps towards justice, but the article warns they may not indicate a significant change in the Court’s overall approach to supporting government policies.
What are the recent Indian Supreme Court decisions that challenge government actions?
Electoral Bonds Scheme Unconstitutional: The Supreme Court declared the electoral bonds scheme unconstitutional. This decision challenges a significant government initiative involving political funding.
For more information read Article1, Article2
AAP Wins in Chandigarh Mayoral Race: The Court pronounced the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) as the winner in the Chandigarh mayoral race. This decision overturned a local electoral outcome, which is a direct challenge to the administrative actions in the election process.
What are the implications of the recent Supreme Court decision?
Positive Implications:
Strengthening Electoral Democracy: These decisions enhance the integrity of India’s electoral democracy by challenging governmental actions, like the electoral bonds scheme, which was seen as opaque and controversial.
Upholding Constitutional Principles: The rulings reflect the judiciary’s role in upholding constitutional principles, especially in high-stakes situations like the Chandigarh mayoral race.
Restoring Public Faith: Such decisions can help restore public faith in the judiciary as an independent institution capable of making unbiased decisions.
Negative Implications:
Limited Political Consequences: Despite the rulings, there’s no substantial political or public backlash against the ruling party, suggesting a lack of significant impact on the political landscape.
Normalization of Institutional Issues: Such occasional rulings don’t address the deeper issues of judicial delays and institutional bias, potentially leading to a normalization of these problems in the Indian political and judicial system.
Way forward
Moving forward, it’s crucial for the Indian judiciary to consistently uphold constitutional principles and ensure impartiality in its decisions. This approach can help rebuild public trust and strengthen democracy, beyond just episodic judgments that seem to counter the government’s actions.
Question for practice:
Evaluate the impact of recent Indian Supreme Court decisions on government actions and institutional integrity.
