ForumIAS LATEST
- SFG FRC 2027 | Program starts from 19th Dec. 2026 | Admissions open for Entrance Test Click Here to know more →
- Prelims Test Series (PTS) for Prelims 2027 starts 11th Oct. 2026 Click Here to know more →
- [Pre-order] Ethics Redbook 3rd Edition: Delivery starts from 10th October onwards Click Here to Read More →
- 21 Sept. | GS Advance Program (GSAP) for UPSC 2027 Mains starts from 11th Oct. Click Here to Read More →
- India has approached several developing countries during the World Trade Organization(WTO) talks in New Delhi to try to build consensus around the new method of measuring Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI).
- India has said that the current method under which the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD) ranks countries based on their services trade policies are biased and counter-intuitive.
- Launched in 2014,the OECD Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI) is a unique, evidence-based tool that provides information on regulations affecting trade in services in 22 sectors across OECD member countries and non-OECD.These countries and sectors represent over 80% of global trade in services.
- However,the study commissioned by Commerce Ministry has found a large number of problems associated with OECD index including some significant design issues that render it impractical for use.
- The study has found that the index ranks Indian services sector as one of the most restrictive particularly in policy areas like foreign entry.But the one sector that has seen maximum liberalisation in India since 1991 is Foreign direct investment(FDI).
- Further,manufacturing trade has a well-documented system of classification of commodities through which we can see how restrictive any country’s policies are.But in services trade there is no way to know whether a country’s policies are restrictive as services trade is usually regulated by domestic regulations and not border tariffs.



