Legal Guarantee for MSP 
Red Book
Red Book

Mains Guidance Program (MGP) for UPSC CSE 2026, Cohort-1 starts 11th February 2025. Registrations Open Click Here to know more and registration.

Source: This post on the Legal Guarantee for MSP has been created based on the article “Yogendra Yadav writes: No, legal guarantee for MSP is not a “folly”published in The Indian Express on 14th January 2025.  

UPSC Syllabus topic: GS Paper 3- Indian Economy 

Context: The article addresses the contentious debate surrounding the demand for a legal guarantee of Minimum Support Price (MSP) for farmers. The article is a direct rebuttal to economist Ashok Gulati’s critique of the demand, presenting a detailed defense of the need for an assured MSP mechanism to support Indian farmers. The context is deeply rooted in the ongoing farmers’ movement and broader debates on agricultural reforms, market liberalization, and state intervention. 

What is the debate around MSP? 

  1. The debate revolves around whether a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP) is feasible and necessary.  
  2. While critics argue it may distort markets and is incompatible with economic liberalization, proponents believe it is crucial to ensure fair prices for farmers and counterbalance systemic biases in agricultural policies. 

Why is MSP important for farmers? 

  1. MSP ensures a minimum price for crops, offering financial security to farmers. 
  2. Farmers often do not realize the announced MSP due to market dynamics and lack of effective implementation. 
  3. Proponents argue it addresses an unwritten social contract between the state and farmers, especially in a poor, democracy-driven country where food prices cannot rise unchecked. 

What are the key criticisms against a legal guarantee for MSP? 

Economist Ashok Gulati and others argue: 

  1. Legal MSP would distort agricultural markets and hinder price discovery. 
  2. It could promote collusion between farmers and traders. 
  3. Freer, less interventionist markets are viewed as a better alternative for sustainable growth. 

How have proponents addressed these criticisms? 

Supporters of legal MSP, including farmer activists, propose nuanced mechanisms: 

  1. Expanding Procurement: Widen the food basket in the Public Distribution System (PDS) and increase procurement levels at MSP. 
  2. Market Intervention: Create targeted schemes to prevent prices from falling below MSP. 
  3. Balanced Trade Policies: Adjust import-export policies to prevent price suppression in domestic markets. 
  4. Price Deficit Payments (PDP): Compensate farmers for the difference between the market price and MSP, without relying on traders’ receipts to prevent collusion. 

What examples support or refute MSP’s effectiveness? 

  1. Critics’ View: Sectors like fishery, meat, poultry, and horticulture, which lack MSP, have grown rapidly due to changing consumer preferences and export opportunities. 
  2. Critics suggests: 
  • Establishing a price stabilization fund for pulses and oilseeds. 
  • Allowing freer market mechanisms to address price discovery and growth. 

3. Proponents’ View: MSP-supported crops like mustard (82% growth) and green gram (113% growth) have outperformed horticulture (51% growth) and milk (78% growth) in the same period (2011-12 to 2022-23). Growth in non-MSP sectors like milk often doesn’t translate to higher incomes for farmers, showing a need for state intervention. 

What would be the cost of implementing a legal MSP? 

Based on 2022-23 calculations: 

  1. Current MSP levels: Rs. 26,565 crore (0.6% of the budget and 0.1% of GDP). 
  2. Revised MSP (C2+50%): Rs. 1,68,227 crore (4.26% of the budget and 0.62% of GDP). 
  3. These costs are modest compared to Rs. 2.08 lakh crore written off by public sector banks and Rs. 1.09 lakh crore corporate tax waivers in the same year. 

What is the way forward for MSP implementation? 

  1. Critics need to offer concrete solutions for making MSP “effective” beyond opposing legal guarantees. 
  2. A balanced approach combining market mechanisms and state intervention could address systemic biases against farmers. 

Discover more from Free UPSC IAS Preparation Syllabus and Materials For Aspirants

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community