ForumIAS LATEST
- Prelims Test Series (PTS) for Prelims 2027 starts 11th Oct. 2026 Click Here to know more →
- [Pre-order] Ethics Redbook 3rd Edition: Delivery starts from 10th October onwards Click Here to Read More →
- 21 Sept. | Forum Residential Coaching (FRC) for UPSC preparation Click Here to know more →
- 21 Sept. | GS Advance Program (GSAP) for UPSC 2027 Mains starts from 10th Oct. Click Here to Read More →
Let’s talk about a supplemental income:
Context:
- There has been a lot of discussion on universal basic income (UBI) in both developed and developing countries
Explanation:
- The primary objective of UBI is to enable every citizen to have a certain minimum income.
- The term ‘universal’ is meant to connote that the minimum or basic income will be provided to everyone irrespective of whatever their current income is.
Issues:
- The adoption of a universal basic income can impose a burden on the fisc which is well beyond the capabilities of most developing countries, including India.
- It is necessary to first decide whether income supplements should be ‘universal’ or limited to certain easily identifiable groups.
- Most calculations involving the provision of income to one and all are beyond the capabilities of the present Central government Budget unless the basic income is fixed at too low a level.
- It is extremely difficult to cut so-called implied subsidies or hidden subsidies in order to fund resources.
Unresolved Concerns:
- There is a philosophical question, whether support to vulnerable sections should be in the form of goods and services or as cash.
- Cash gives the discretion to beneficiaries to spend it any way they like. But it is assumed they would be wise in their discretion.
- On the other hand, the provision of services or goods directly to beneficiaries may be directed to achieve certain objectives in terms of nutrition or health or education.
- In the provision of services, the concern is about leakages and quality of service.
- As far as India is concerned, there are a whole lot of services provided by the state, and it would be impossible to knock them off and substitute them with general income support.



