Money can’t always buy votes

ForumIAS announcing GS Foundation Program for UPSC CSE 2025-26 from 19 April. Click Here for more information.

ForumIAS Answer Writing Focus Group (AWFG) for Mains 2024 commencing from 24th June 2024. The Entrance Test for the program will be held on 28th April 2024 at 9 AM. To know more about the program visit: https://forumias.com/blog/awfg2024

Money can’t always buy votes

Context:

  • There is a widely held belief that voters in India, especially the poor, sell their votes in exchange for cash or other briberies.
  • Thus, the supply of cash and consumption of liquor increases during elections remains unexplained.

What does recent research says about briberies during election?

  • Recent research says that spending of money was not reflected in the vote count.
  • The candidate who spent the most came nowhere near winning the seat, while the candidate who won a landslide victory did so with limited spending.
  • Thus, distribution of money is seen as an uncertain investment and a leap of faith on the part of the candidate.

What is the reason behind such briberies in India?

Cash to support a campaign:

  • Parties have weak organisations at the local level and face heavy institutional constraints.
  • Thus, money acts as a substitute for the organisation as cash is used to engage vote mobilisers or local individuals who will seek votes for a party and/or candidate.

A cheaper move:

  • Given the size of constituencies, a candidate requires an army of workers during the campaign period which ends up being quite expensive.
  • To avoid this, candidates spend huge sums of money on cash, liquor and gifts that they hand out to their middlemen.

Money signals access to powerful networks:

  • Money allows candidates to mobilize supporters who in turn can pull a crowd together.
  • The display of money during elections is socially approved in certain ways, is a political necessity, and is born of cultural expectations.
Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community