Collapse of Adivasi self-governance system in Jharkhand: Need to implement PESA

ForumIAS announcing GS Foundation Program for UPSC CSE 2025-26 from 19 April. Click Here for more information.

ForumIAS Answer Writing Focus Group (AWFG) for Mains 2024 commencing from 24th June 2024. The Entrance Test for the program will be held on 28th April 2024 at 9 AM. To know more about the program visit: https://forumias.com/blog/awfg2024

Source: Down to Earth

Relevance: Reviving tribal self-governance system

Synopsis: The PESA Act is considered to be the backbone of tribal legislation in India. Proper implementation can rejuvenate self-governance system in Jharkhand.

Background

During most of the time in history, Adivasis had their own federal governance system. These decision-making processes were considered people-centric and democratic. The administrative systems during the colonial period and elected parliamentary democracy after independence affected this Adivasi governance system to a great extent.

  • For example, the introduction of the Bihar Panchayat Raj System (BPRS) in 1947 made Adivasi traditional governance systems weak.

This was aggravated by industrialization, displacement of Adivasis and urbanisation. As a result, the traditional system disappeared from most Adivasi areas. Also, the PESA Act, which was supposed to uphold the traditional decision-making process, has so far not been fully implemented in its true spirit.

Traditional governance system of Adivasis: Village Council
  • The Adivasis were not a part of the caste society. They had their own system of governance, which was, unlike the caste system, non-hierarchical.
  • Every tribal village had a village council as the basic unit for self-governance.
  • The names are different in different tribes though. For example, ‘Parha Raja System’ for Munda and Oraon tribe, ‘Munda Manki System’ for Ho tribe.
  • These forums used to act as the decision-making bodies for all matters related to administration, justice, law making (social Sanctions). Consent from the whole village was considered to be the main component of this decentralised decision-making process.
Issues with traditional governance system

Though this traditional system of self-governance helped make the Adivasi communities decide for themselves, it had several loopholes too.

  • Absence of women in this entire process of decision making.
  • The chiefs of the traditional self-governance system of tribes in Jharkhand would be selected hereditarily. No woman was allowed to be the chief at any level.
  • This system also denied women’s right to own property.
Introduction of PESA
  • To promote local self-governance in rural India, the 73rd constitutional amendment was made in 1992.
  • Through this amendment, a three-tier Panchayati Raj Institution was made into a law.
  • However, its application to the scheduled and tribal areas under Article 243(M) was restricted.
  • After the Bhuria Committee recommendations in 1995, Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Areas (PESA) Act 1996 came into existence for ensuring tribal self-rule for people living in scheduled areas of India.
  • The PESA Act conferred the absolute powers to Gram Sabha, whereas state legislature has given an advisory role to ensure the proper functioning of Panchayats and Gram Sabhas.
PESA violations
  • Out of 22 provisions in the PESA, Jharkhand has taken only seven of them and replaced the fifteen provisions by the general administrative norms of the Panchayat system for non-Scheduled Areas.
  • PESA in Jharkhand remained partial in terms of the special rights that the Adivasis of Scheduled Areas in Jharkhand should enjoy.
  • The partially implemented PESA has worsened self-governance in Adivasi areas in Jharkhand.
  • Ananth and Kalaivanan (2017) stated that PESA did not deliver due to the lack of clarity, legal infirmity, bureaucratic apathy, absence of a political will, resistance to change in the hierarchy of power, and so on.
  • Social audits conducted across the state have also pointed out that in reality different developmental schemes were being approved on paper by Gram Sabha as a vetting entity without actually having any meeting for discussion and decision making.
  • Hardly any regular meetings of Gram Sabha are conducted.
Way forward
  • PESA recognises the traditional system of the decision-making process and stands for the peoples’ self-governance.
  • If it is implemented in letter and spirit, it will rejuvenate the dying self-governance system in the tribal area of Jharakhand.
Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community