M Venkaiah Naidu on One Nation One Election: Together, for the greater good

Source– The post is based on the article “M Venkaiah Naidu on One Nation One Election: Together, for the greater good” published in “The Indian Express” on 22nd September 2023.

Syllabus: GS2- Indian Polity

News– The concept of One Nation, One Election has been a topic of debate for several years.

What are arguments in favour of One Nation, One Election?

The Election Commission of India proposed synchronised elections in 1983 and 1999.

In 2018, the NITI Aayog introduced the concept of One Nation, One Election.

Financial burden- The Indian electoral system involves large costs during each election cycle. India’s election machinery is in constant operation due to elections at various levels of government throughout the year.

The expenses associated with conducting elections, security of polling stations, deploying security forces, and logistics are substantial. In addition to the financial costs, there are logistical challenges and a strain on human resources.

Impact on governance- Frequent elections demand a significant workforce. It includes police personnel, administrative staff from various departments, and educators like teachers and lecturers.

This disrupts regular government functions and delays development projects. It also impacts the academic calendars of schools and colleges.

Political polarization- Regular elections often contribute to political polarization since politicians are constantly engaged in election campaigning. They prioritize short-term gains over long-term policy planning.

Earlier experience- India had experienced simultaneous elections during specific periods. Notably, elections held in 1952, 1957, and 1962, as well as in 1967 followed the One Nation, One Election principle.

What are the advantages of One Nation, One Election?

Improved governance– Reduced election frequency would minimize disruptions in government operations. It will allow bureaucrats and elected officials to focus more on governance.

Promote national interest- it promotes cooperation among political parties. When elections are synchronized, parties would be compelled to seek common ground and consensus on vital national and state-level matters.

This could lead to more collaborative policymaking and a better, unified understanding of issues.

Political participation- Such an approach would alleviate voter fatigue and encourage more active participation in elections. Voters frequently face multiple elections in a single year, which can lead to weariness, apathy, and potential disengagement.