Canada’s entrenched culture of self-righteousness is to blame for current crisis

Source: The post is based on the article “C Raja Mohan writes: Canada’s entrenched culture of self-righteousness is to blame for current crisis” published in “Indian express” on 3rd October 2023.

Syllabus: GS2- International relation- Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests.

News: The article discusses the strained relationship between India and Canada due to historical nuclear issues and current concerns about Khalistan militant groups in Canada. It highlights Canada’s moralpolitik and suggests a fresh approach based on realpolitik to resolve the bilateral crises.

How has the relationship between India and Canada evolved?

Historically, India and Canada shared idealism, advocating for a normative global order up until the mid-1970s.

In the Cold War era, both nations collaborated on global issues, such as the Korean War and the Suez Crisis.

Canada played a pivotal role in India’s nuclear development, assisting with the CIRUS research reactor and CANDU power reactor projects.

Relations took a downturn after India’s 1974 nuclear test, which Canada criticized, viewing it as betrayal.

Canada’s domestic politics, particularly its association with Khalistani groups since the 1980s, added more strain.

The Conservative rule under Stephen Harper (2006-15) hinted at improved bilateral ties.

However, under Justin Trudeau’s leadership, India voiced concerns over Canada’s perceived soft stance on Khalistani extremists.

What are the current concerns in the India-Canada relationship?

Khalistan Extremist Groups

Canada has Khalistani militants operating on its soil, which is a significant concern for India. Ottawa has shown reluctance to address India’s worries about the criminal actions of these groups.

Political Stances and Moralpolitik

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s approach, involving “vote bank politics” and supporting Khalistani groups, troubles India. Trudeau’s administration does not seem to fully grasp or acknowledge India’s concerns, adhering instead to a kind of moral high ground in international affairs.

What should be done?

Address Khalistani Concerns: Canada should take a political look at the Khalistani militants’ activities, acknowledging India’s concerns about their operations on Canadian soil.

Reassess Political Strategies: Trudeau’s administration might need to rethink its “vote bank politics” and its soft stance on Khalistani groups to ensure a stronger India-Canada relationship.

Promote Collaboration: India suggests a path of cooperation, offering to work with Ottawa based on credible intelligence-sharing. This can serve as a foundation for enhanced bilateral ties.

Act Against Extremists: India’s expectation is clear; Canada should curb the empowerment of Khalistani extremists, address their political impunity, and put a stop to their violent activities.

Rebuild Trust: Both countries should work on rebuilding trust, moving past previous tensions, and focusing on shared interests and mutual benefits.